Social Media Engagement Metrics

Monday 31 July 2017
What does all of this have to do with social media metrics? On the face of it, nothing much.

But look deeper, and you’ll see that this particular sports story means nothing without being put into historical context. That 76-year wait turned a great win into a momentous one. While you will not have to wait 76 years to see results from your latest social media marketing campaign, your reports also need context if you are to draw conclusions which are useful, interesting and yes, even exciting.

Without context, without a frame of reference, you won’t be able to decipher whether your 150 post comments represent great, average or mediocre engagement. Without context, no raw statistic – whether a sports result or your digital campaign – carries any real weight. So it’s with context in mind that we take a look at three key social media metrics and why they matter for your business.
 
Conversation Rate and Cost Per Engagement

While those 150 comments on one of your posts may look great, this number means very little in isolation. 150 comments on a 500-fan page is excellent, but the larger your following, the more ordinary this same number appears. Instead, comments should be measured by conversation rate, which is the ratio of comments on your post relative to your number of page likes, reflected as a percentage. Similarly, your Cost Per Engagement (available via Facebook analytics), is a good barometer of the number of comments or other actions relative to the amount of money you’ve spent advertising your content.

In each case, you’re putting your results into perspective, allowing you to set realistic targets in the future.
 
Engagement Rate (based on reach)

For a good few years, marketers and social media managers have paid close attention to engagement. Yet again, “300 engagements” doesn’t mean much on its own. This is where engagement rate comes in – this is a metric that measures the level of engagement that a piece of content has received, reflected as a percentage. The most accurate engagement rate is one based on reach (Total Engagements divided by Total Reach and multiplied by 100). Effectively, you’re calculating the percentage of people who saw your post and chose to engage with it. Engagement Rate makes it easy to compare the performance of different posts, even if those posts had different allocated budgets. It also makes it easy to establish engagement benchmarks for your page, allowing you to set realistic goals for future campaigns.
 
Identify Growth and Engagement Irregularities

This one requires a bit more manual intervention when putting together your report, but your findings will be worth it.

Let’s say you reached 2500 people in February; sure, it may represent a numerical, month-on-month improvement for your business, but what if the bulk of that reach came from just one or two posts? To find out, pop into Facebook analytics and look at your daily growth or total reach graphs, preferably over a period of at least one month. These will show you the peaks and dips in your page’s performance. If you spot an unusually high amount of activity, you can trace this to a specific day or post. In the context – yes, that word again – of your specific business, why do you think the post did so well? Answer as best you can, and try to replicate these lessons in future content.
Read more ...

Facebook Marketplace is to Receive Advertisements

Monday 31 July 2017
Facebook is looking for new opportunities for advertisements. Since the space in the newsfeed is slowly running down, advertising in its own volume should be able to be shown in the future. A test is currently running.

Facebook wants to display ads on its own in the future. As the company now reported, there should be a test, in which the new advertisements are only a small part of users in the US are displayed. Afterwards, one wants to evaluate the general responses before Facebook wants to take further steps to the new feature, now announced Michelle Bonner Techel, Product Marketing Manager at Facebook, in a statement. Launched in October last year, the online service was designed to help users buy and sell things across the network.

Test with free advertisements

Since it is still a test run, no ads for the volume can be purchased. Instead, Facebook uses advertising that is already visible in the newsfeed and uses it for the volume. This "experiment" is free for the owners of the selected ads. The new advertisements will have the same appearance as in the newsfeed. The user will not be able to buy the advertised product directly via Facebook, but will land with a click on the advertisement on a landing page specially designed by the advertiser.

Volume rewards mixed reviews

The new feature, which is currently only found in the Facebook app, has not yet been convincing all users. Although or perhaps just because it is free for the user and Facebook does not deserve anything on a sale, the bad quality of the products is particularly criticized. In an article from March this year, the volume is compared to a junk store to get rid of things. Although there are no official figures on how much is actually sold across the markets, however, it needs to have enough access that Facebook is lucrative enough for advertisements.
Read more ...